EFFECTIVE METHODS OF DEVELOPING TECHNICAL THINKING THROUGH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM

Авторы

  • Sharipova Shakhruza Nusrat qizi Bukhara State Technical University Автор

Ключевые слова:

digital technologies, technical thinking, higher education, virtual laboratory, simulation, pedagogical methodology, competency-based approach

Аннотация

This article analyzes effective methods for developing technical thinking in students based on digital technologies in the higher education system from a scientific, theoretical and practical perspective. The role and importance of technical thinking in the process of training technical specialists in the context of digital transformation are highlighted, and the didactic possibilities of modern tools such as virtual laboratories, digital modeling, simulation programs, and artificial intelligence-based learning platforms are revealed. The research substantiates pedagogical methods aimed at developing technical thinking based on a competency-based and systematic approach. The results of the article serve to improve the quality of education in higher education institutions.

Библиографические ссылки

UNESCO. (2023). Global Education Monitoring Report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? Paris: UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/UZQV8501

Anderson, T. (Ed.). (2008). The Theory and Practice of Online Learning (2nd ed.). Athabasca University Press. https://doi.org/10.15215/aupress/9781897425084.01

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1).

OECD. (2016). Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Grover, S., & Pea, R. (2013). Computational thinking in K–12: A review of the state of the field. Educational Researcher, 42(1), 38–43. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12463051

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x

Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V. M., & Jovanović, K. (2016). Virtual laboratories for education in science, technology, and engineering: A review. Computers & Education, 95, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002

May, D., Jahnke, I., & Moore, S. (2023). Online laboratories and virtual experimentation in higher education from a sociotechnical-pedagogical design perspective. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35, 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09380-3

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Abdurashidova, M., Balbaa, M. E., Nematov, S., Mukhiddinov, Z., & Nasriddinov, I. (2023). The impact of innovation and digitalization on the quality of higher education: A study of selected universities in Uzbekistan. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 32(1), Article 20230070. https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2023-0070

Baxtiyorova, M., & Qoshaqova, G. (2026). Digital technologies and modern pedagogy: Evidence from Uzbekistan. Qo‘qon universiteti xabarnomasi, 17, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.54613/ku.v17i.1375

Sharipova, Z. S. (2025). Digital transformation of the education system in Uzbekistan: Challenges, opportunities, and future prospects. Pioneering Studies and Theories, 1(4), 35–39. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15046348

Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x

Smith, K. A., Sheppard, S. D., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). Pedagogies of engagement: Classroom-based practices. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00831.x

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. U.S. Department of Education.

Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books.

Опубликован

2026-10-17

Как цитировать

EFFECTIVE METHODS OF DEVELOPING TECHNICAL THINKING THROUGH DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM. (2026). ZAMONAVIY TA’LIMDA ISLOHOTLAR VA TEXNIK TAFAKKUR, 1(2), 1057-1064. https://texniktafakkur.com/ttp/article/view/185

Похожие статьи

1-10 из 17

Вы также можете начать расширеннвй поиск похожих статей для этой статьи.