DUAL TA’LIM MUHITIDA BO‘LAJAK MUHANDISLARNING DIZAYNERLIK QOBILIYATINI RIVOJLANTIRISH BO‘YICHA MAHALLIY VA XORIJIY TAJRIBALAR
Keywords:
korxona mentori, prototiplash, muhandislik dizayni, dizaynerlik qobiliyati, muhandislik ta’limi, dual ta’limAbstract
Maqolada dual ta’lim muhitida bo‘lajak muhandislarning dizaynerlik qobiliyatini rivojlantirishga doir mahalliy va xorijiy tajribalar qiyosiy-pedagogik nuqtayi nazardan tahlil qilinadi. Dizaynerlik qobiliyati muammoni aniqlash, variant yaratish, muhandislik hisobini bajarish, raqamli modellashtirish, prototiplash, sinov natijasini talqin qilish va yechimni takomillashtirishni birlashtiruvchi integrativ kasbiy sifat sifatida asoslanadi. Tadqiqot natijasida universitet va korxona vazifalarini yagona dizayn sprintida bog‘lovchi hamkorlik modeli, kompetensiya dalillari zanjiri hamda qo‘shma baholash mezonlari taklif etiladi
References
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasining 2025-yil 16-yanvardagi 14-son qarori. Oliy ta’lim tizimida dual ta’limni tashkil etish chora-tadbirlari to‘g‘risida. Qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi. https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-7332601
Dym C.L., Agogino A.M., Eris O., Frey D.D., Leifer L.J. Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning // Journal of Engineering Education. 2005. Vol. 94, No. 1. P. 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x
Atman C.J., Adams R.S., Cardella M.E., Turns J., Mosborg S., Saleem J. Engineering Design Processes: A Comparison of Students and Expert Practitioners // Journal of Engineering Education. 2007. Vol. 96, No. 4. P. 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x
Björklund L. The Repertory Grid Technique: Making Tacit Knowledge Explicit: Assessing Creative Work and Problem Solving Skills // International Journal of ePortfolio. 2013. Vol. 3, No. 1. P. 47–69.
CDIO Initiative. CDIO Standards 3.0. 2020. https://cdio.org/content/cdio-standards-30
Crawley E.F., Malmqvist J., Östlund S., Brodeur D.R., Edström K. Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. 2nd ed. Cham: Springer, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9
Kolmos A., Fink F.K., Krogh L. (eds.). The Aalborg PBL Model: Progress, Diversity and Challenges. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press, 2004.
Prince M.J., Felder R.M. Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases // Journal of Engineering Education. 2006. Vol. 95, No. 2. P. 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
Billett S. Vocational Education: Purposes, Traditions and Prospects. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1954-5
Euler D. Germany’s Dual Vocational Training System: A Model for Other Countries? Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung, 2013.
Cedefop. Governance and Financing of Apprenticeships. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2016. https://doi.org/10.2801/201055
Sharipov Sh.S., Muslimov N.A., Qodirov M. Texnik ijodkorlik va dizayn. – Toshkent, 2010.
Murodov Sh.K. Amaliy geometriya: muhandislik grafikasi va dizayn nazariyasi mutaxassisligi magistrantlari uchun darslik. – Toshkent, 2011.
Tashimov N.E., Ashirboyev A.O., Valiyev A.N. Muhandislik grafikasi va dizayn nazariyasi: 5A110802 mutaxassisligi bo‘yicha o‘quv dasturi. – Toshkent: Nizomiy nomidagi TDPU, 2019. ojs.qarshidu.uz
Bobomurodova L.E. Texnik ijodkorlik va dizayn fanidan amaliy mashg‘ulotlarni bajarish bo‘yicha uslubiy ko‘rsatma. – Samarqand, 2019.
