TEXNIK OLIY TA’LIMDA MUSTAQIL TA’LIM SAMARADORLIGINI TA’MINLASH MASALALARI
Ключевые слова:
refleksiya, qayta aloqa, raqamli ta’lim muhiti, portfolio, texnik dalil, loyiha asosida ta’lim, muhandislik topshirig‘i, mustaqil ta’lim, texnik oliy ta’limАннотация
Maqolada texnik oliy ta’limda mustaqil ta’lim samaradorligini ta’minlashning nazariy, tashkiliy va metodik masalalari tahlil qilinadi. Mustaqil ta’lim topshiriqni auditoriyadan tashqarida bajarish shakli emas, balki maqsad qo‘yish, faol izlanish, texnik mahsulot yaratish, dalil yig‘ish, o‘z faoliyatini monitoring qilish va natijani yangi vaziyatga ko‘chirishni birlashtiruvchi boshqariladigan o‘quv sikli sifatida talqin etiladi. Milliy me’yoriy asoslar, mahalliy pedagogik qarashlar hamda o‘zini o‘zi boshqarib o‘rganish, muammoli va loyiha asosida ta’lim bo‘yicha xorijiy tadqiqotlar qiyosiy o‘rganildi. Natijada mustaqil ta’limning dalilga asoslangan sikli, uch qatlamli boshqaruv arxitekturasi, samaradorlikning besh komponentli mezoni va texnik topshiriqlarni loyihalash bo‘yicha takliflar ishlab chiqildi
Библиографические ссылки
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Vazirlar Mahkamasining 2020-yil 31-dekabrdagi 824-son qarori. Oliy ta’lim muassasalarida o‘quv jarayoniga kredit-modul tizimini joriy etish tartibi to‘g‘risidagi nizomni tasdiqlash haqida. Qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi. https://lex.uz/docs/-5193564
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining 2019-yil 8-oktabrdagi PF-5847-son Farmoni. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi oliy ta’lim tizimini 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida. https://lex.uz/docs/-4545884
3. Azizxo‘jayeva N.N. Pedagogik texnologiyalar va pedagogik mahorat. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston yozuvchilar uyushmasi Adabiyot jamg‘armasi, 2006. 160 b.
4. Tolipov O‘.Q., Usmonboyeva M. Pedagogik texnologiyalarning tatbiqiy asoslari. Toshkent: Fan, 2006. 261 b.
5. Ishmuhamedov R.J., Abduqodirov A.A., Pardaev A. Ta’limda innovatsion texnologiyalar. Toshkent: Iste’dod, 2008. 180 b.
6. Avliyoqulov N.X. O‘qitishning modulli tizimi va pedagogik texnologiyasi amaliy asoslari. Buxoro, 2001. 49 b.
7. Zimmerman B.J. Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview // Theory Into Practice. 2002. Vol. 41, No. 2. P. 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15430421TIP4102_2
8. Pintrich P.R. A Conceptual Framework for Assessing Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students // Educational Psychology Review. 2004. Vol. 16. P. 385–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0006-x
9. Panadero E. A Review of Self-Regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research // Frontiers in Psychology. 2017. Vol. 8. Article 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422
10. Loyens S.M.M., Magda J., Rikers R.M.J.P. Self-Directed Learning in Problem-Based Learning and Its Relationships with Self-Regulated Learning // Educational Psychology Review. 2008. Vol. 20. P. 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7
11. Prince M.J., Felder R.M. Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases // Journal of Engineering Education. 2006. Vol. 95, No. 2. P. 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
12. Broadbent J., Poon W.L. Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Academic Achievement in Online Higher Education Learning Environments: A Systematic Review // The Internet and Higher Education. 2015. Vol. 27. P. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
13. Theobald M. Self-Regulated Learning Training Programs Enhance University Students’ Academic Performance, Self-Regulated Learning Strategies, and Motivation: A Meta-Analysis // Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2021. Vol. 66. Article 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101976
14. CDIO Initiative. CDIO Standards 3.0. 2020. https://cdio.org/content/cdio-standards-30
