TALABALARNING TADQIQOT KO‘NIKMALARINI BAHOLASHNING MEZONLI-DIAGNOSTIK MODELI
Keywords:
diagnostik dalil, indikator, pedagogik diagnostika, mezonli baholash, tadqiqot ko‘nikmasi, rivojlanish darajasi, refleksiya, triangulyatsiya, portfolio, analitik rubrikaAbstract
Maqolada oliy ta’lim talabalarining tadqiqot ko‘nikmalarini baholash uchun mezonli-diagnostik model nazariy-metodik jihatdan asoslangan. Normativ hujjatlar, Research Skill Development konsepsiyasi, tadqiqot kompetensiyasini o‘lchash vositalari hamda rubrikali va autentik baholashga oid manbalar integrativ tahlil qilindi. Tadqiqot ko‘nikmasining mualliflik ta’rifi, motivatsion-maqsadli, kognitiv-metodologik, operatsion-tadqiqotchilik, analitik-interpretatsion va refleksiv-baholash mezonlari ishlab chiqildi. Har bir mezon uchun indikator, faoliyat mahsuli va diagnostika vositasi belgilandi. Model muammoli topshiriq, mini-loyiha, portfolio, kuzatuv, o‘zini o‘zi, o‘zaro va ekspert baholarini triangulyatsiya qiladi
References
1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Ta’lim to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni. O‘RQ-637-son, 2020-yil 23-sentabr. Qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi. URL: https://lex.uz/docs/-5013007 (murojaat sanasi: 23.09.2026).
2. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “O‘zbekiston Respublikasi oliy ta’lim tizimini 2030-yilgacha rivojlantirish konsepsiyasini tasdiqlash to‘g‘risida”gi PF-5847-son Farmoni. 2019-yil 8-oktabr. URL: https://lex.uz/docs/-4545884 (murojaat sanasi: 23.09.2026).
3. OECD. The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. – Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018. – 23 p.
4. Willison J., O’Regan K. Commonly Known, Commonly Not Known, Totally Unknown: A Framework for Students Becoming Researchers // Higher Education Research & Development. – 2007. – Vol. 26, No. 4. – P. 393–409. DOI: 10.1080/07294360701658609.
5. Healey M., Jenkins A. Developing Undergraduate Research and Inquiry. – York: The Higher Education Academy, 2009. – 152 p.
6. Kardash C.M. Evaluation of an Undergraduate Research Experience: Perceptions of Undergraduate Interns and Their Faculty Mentors // Journal of Educational Psychology. – 2000. – Vol. 92, No. 1. – P. 191–201. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.191.
7. Jonsson A., Svingby G. The Use of Scoring Rubrics: Reliability, Validity and Educational Consequences // Educational Research Review. – 2007. – Vol. 2, No. 2. – P. 130–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2007.05.002.
8. Panadero E., Jonsson A. The Use of Scoring Rubrics for Formative Assessment Purposes Revisited: A Review // Educational Research Review. – 2013. – Vol. 9. – P. 129–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002.
9. Böttcher F., Thiel F. Evaluating Research-Oriented Teaching: A New Instrument to Assess University Students’ Research Competences // Higher Education. – 2018. – Vol. 75, No. 1. – P. 91–110. DOI: 10.1007/s10734-017-0128-y.
10. Timmerman B.C., Feldon D., Maher M., Strickland D., Gilmore J. Performance-Based Assessment of Graduate Student Research Skills: Timing, Trajectory, and Potential Thresholds // Studies in Higher Education. – 2013. – Vol. 38, No. 5. – P. 693–710. DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2011.590971.
11. Ianni P.A., Samuels E.M., Eakin B.L., Perorazio T.E., Ellingrod V.L. Assessments of Research Competencies for Clinical Investigators: A Systematic Review // Evaluation & the Health Professions. – 2021. – Vol. 44, No. 3. – P. 268–278. DOI: 10.1177/0163278719896392.
12. Ciraso-Calí A., Martínez-Fernández J.R., París-Mañas G., Sánchez-Martí A., García-Ravidá L.B. The Research Competence: Acquisition and Development Among Undergraduates in Education Sciences // Frontiers in Education. – 2022. – Vol. 7. – Article 836165. – 11 p. DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2022.836165.
